WILL The New AMSOIL (DEO) CJ-4 Premium Diesel Oil protect against acid as well as claimed?
WILL The New AMSOIL (DEO) CJ-4 Premium Diesel Oil protect against acid as well as claimed? I have been asked this question many times. While there are many differing opinions on the subject, and most all of them have good points to consider when trying to determine whether you would like to use a New CJ-4 rated oil with a lower TBN value like the AMSOIL (DEO & DME) 5W & 15W-40 Premium API CJ-4 Synthetic Diesel Oils, or a CI-4 rated oil like the AMSOIL (AME) Synthetic Diesel & Marine Motor Oil SAE 15W-40.
However, I have an 2003 GMC Sierra 2500HD Duramax (LB7) that I use to haul Christmas Trees mostly, and those trees put a good amount of strain on the truck, so it is a perfect platform for testing since I only haul during the Christmas Season. This way I can haul with the oil and then allow it the opportunity to do it's job. While being able to test regularly to see how it is doing protecting my LB7 model engine.
Bearing that in mind, I have used the AMSOIL Synthetic Diesel & Marine Motor Oil SAE 15W-40 in my truck since I bought it and performed oil analysis on that oil when I made the change over to AMSOIL (DEO) Premium API CJ-4 Synthetic 5W-40 Diesel Oil. Then I ran the truck hauling Christmas Trees from the day before Thanksgiving until the second week in December, approximately 10-15 days. I covered approximately 5K miles during this time, all of which was hooked to a trailer whether loaded or empty. Over this period my overall average mileage stood strong at 12.124****, so to say that I maintained great mileage is an understatement!
However, I waited until after the first of the year to take another UOA Sample for testing. I took that sample on January 15th, (the first sample was submitted on November 7th), and sent it in. The first sample with the AMSOIL Synthetic Diesel & Marine Motor Oil SAE 15W-40 showed a TBN of 14.80 while after testing the AMSOIL (DEO) Premium API CJ-4 Synthetic 5W-40 showed a TBN level at testing of 7.33. If the lower TBn is going to make a difference in how this oil protects then I may be in for some higher wear metal and acid numbers in future testing. We will see.
now, please note that in the first test I was flagged for marginally high Iron numbers at 88 Parts Per Million, which the way I drive this truck, I would expect a little wear. While everything else in the report looked good, I had been running that oil for approximately 2 years and 16,7** miles. In 2007 I hauled with it, but in 2008 I had purchased a dually for hauling so there was no need IMHO to change the oil in this truck, and that is what accounts for the LONG period with such low mileage. However, when I submitted the report, I did not want & Time In Service & to be an issue to I put down that it had only been one year.
Now, if you notice, in the second report. As expected due to simply changing the oil, the Iron number went down; Boron, and additive metal is showing higher than normal for the tested oil, which can be explained by additives from the previous oil being left behind and mixing with the new oil. however, this should level out in longer interval trending on future analysis reports. Now, you will also notice that the fuel dilution is 1% higher with the DEO over the AME. This I attribute to the fact that during the beginning of my hauling season this year I ran the first trip without adding any fuel additives. As a result the truck began to smoke blue and I am sure some fuel made it into the crank case. However, I did this on purpose to test my theory and after adding a half a bottle each of (DFC) and (ACB) AMSOIL Fuel Additives into one tank, by the time I got halfway through that tank the smoking/hazing was gone. So for there to be a bit of fuel dilution in the second sample makes sense. Up to 5% is considered to be acceptable for continued use, but if you have 4-5% showing in your analysis reports you may want to have your truck checked to figure out exactly why it is happening.
(((PLEASE NOTE: On Post 2007 Model Trucks Equipped With Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) May Show Higher Fuel Dilution Levels In Shorter Intervals Due To The Active Regeneration of the DPF. This is an ongoing issue with Post 2007 DPF Equipped Light Trucks, and Several CAT Brand On Road Tractors.)))
What do I expect? I expect to see higher additive metal numbers in future testing to a point and then have them taper off. I also expect to see the fuel dilution to either stay the same or get lower. As for wear metals? IDK, I do not want to guess at this point, I would like the results to speak for themselves, but I recommend that you set up email notification of the replies to this topic so that you see the next results when they come in.
Below you will find pics of the loads I haul as well as the oil analysis report.
Please Contact The Synthetic Motorsports Authorized Dealer Of Your Choice With More Immediate Questions
God Bless!!!
Chris
CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
![]()




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks


Reply With Quote




Bookmarks